<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Greensboro Amateur Radio Association, Greensboro, NC | John Ferrell | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.w4gso.org/members/w8ccw/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.w4gso.org/members/w8ccw/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for John Ferrell.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 22:14:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.0</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5f0978e161a89c922b484bd87de128c9</guid>
				<title>John Ferrell replied to the topic Sunday Night Tech Forum - To use radios with unknown spurious emissions, or not? in the forum Technical Discussions</title>
				<link>http://www.w4gso.org/forums/t/sunday-night-tech-forum-use-radios-unknown-spurious-emissions-not/#post-1026</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:41:39 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a post that Harold made elsewhere:<br />
Her&#8217;s the FCC equipment authorization requirement for unintentional<br />
radiators:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/15/101/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/15/101/</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a list of exempt equipment:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/15/103/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/15/103/</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s also an exemption for devices built by a user for personal&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1623"><a href="http://www.w4gso.org/forums/t/sunday-night-tech-forum-use-radios-unknown-spurious-emissions-not/#post-1026" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c589984720dd6fd52ec7d74d435111b1</guid>
				<title>John Ferrell replied to the topic Sunday Night Tech Forum - To use radios with unknown spurious emissions, or not? in the forum Technical Discussions</title>
				<link>http://www.w4gso.org/forums/t/sunday-night-tech-forum-use-radios-unknown-spurious-emissions-not/#post-1025</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:32:26 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/97/307/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/97/307/</a></p>
<p>Amateur Service Emission requirements.<br />
de W8CCW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e3986900aad7bfe14861832a019ff343</guid>
				<title>John Ferrell replied to the topic Sunday Night Tech Forum - To use radios with unknown spurious emissions, or not? in the forum Technical Discussions</title>
				<link>http://www.w4gso.org/forums/t/sunday-night-tech-forum-use-radios-unknown-spurious-emissions-not/#post-1024</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2015 21:27:40 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/</a><br />
Amateur Radio Service, Part 97:<br />
<a href="http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/97/index.php" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.hallikainen.com/FccRules/2015/97/index.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7740d20b5bd161dc8d7feebc607bfe9f</guid>
				<title>John Ferrell replied to the topic Suggested Watt/SWR Meters in the forum Technical Discussions</title>
				<link>http://www.w4gso.org/forums/t/suggested-wattswr-meters/#post-899</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:33:22 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pay dearly for professional grade tools. If you really need it there is no getting around it. As an old timer, Byrd Watt meters have always been the best. </p>
<p>OTH, I have an old Palstar meter that was once popular among the CB crowd. It serves my needs up to about 50mhz.<br />
Heathkit once built a vhf/uhf unit that worked very well at a reasonable&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2174"><a href="http://www.w4gso.org/forums/t/suggested-wattswr-meters/#post-899" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7740d20b5bd161dc8d7feebc607bfe9f</guid>
				<title>John Ferrell replied to the topic Suggested Watt/SWR Meters in the forum Technical Discussions</title>
				<link>http://w4gso.org/forums/t/suggested-wattswr-meters/#post-899</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:33:22 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pay dearly for professional grade tools. If you really need it there is no getting around it. As an old timer, Byrd Watt meters have always been the best. </p>
<p>OTH, I have an old Palstar meter that was once popular among the CB crowd. It serves my needs up to about 50mhz.<br />
Heathkit once built a vhf/uhf unit that worked very well at a reasonable&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-1542"><a href="http://w4gso.org/forums/t/suggested-wattswr-meters/#post-899" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c013d7ff364ce9eb1fa78ee84bf0f5a3</guid>
				<title>John Ferrell started the topic Industry News in the forum Rag Chew</title>
				<link>http://w4gso.org/forums/t/industry-news/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2015 17:53:04 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?474716-Ten-Tec-and-Alpha-sold-to-RKR" rel="nofollow ugc">http://forums.qrz.com/showthread.php?474716-Ten-Tec-and-Alpha-sold-to-RKR</a><br />
TenTec &amp; Alpha New Owners</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">aa6ae0def0adbd969ab6243bbebdf7b8</guid>
				<title>John Ferrell started the topic Feedlines in the forum Technical Discussions</title>
				<link>http://w4gso.org/forums/t/feedlines/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2015 19:15:26 -0400</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have several coax jumper cables that are of unknown quality. Other than trying to use them are there any common procedures to check them out? Ohmeter checks for opens &amp; shorts are a given.  de W8CCW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0b45a5ff26ccfd7d2d2bd8f70dfeb9de</guid>
				<title>John Ferrell became a registered member</title>
				<link>https://www.w4gso.org/activity/p/57/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:43:48 -0400</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin


Served from: www.w4gso.org @ 2026-04-06 13:03:35 by W3 Total Cache
-->